The Record trademark has long been associated with the woodworker’s quick release vice of choice and for a while in the earlier part of the the 20th century they created a model that has arguably never been bettered in either design nor quality1)incidentally, the Record woodworker’s vices were available 3 jaw widths: 7”, 9” and 10 1/2″. For reasons best known to themselves, C J Hampton named these with model numbers 52, 52 1/2 and 53 respectively. The 52 1/2 (9”) model is convenient size for lots of wood working jobs and was the most popular option.
The Original Model
C & J Hampton registered the ‘record’ trademark in 19092)c.f David Lynch http://www.recordhandplanes.com/history.html and trade listings from this time show that they own a foundry and are manufacturing vices and other tools. By this time Parkinson’s patent would have expired so there was nothing to prevent C&J Hampton from simply making a copy, and this is what they did.
The Tools and Trades History Society have made an early C&J Hampton catalogue (June 1910) available to members, and the model 23 vice gets a full page spread:
In this catalogue the ‘Record’ trademark is only used for their vices and was presumably registered, at least initially, for this purpose. Although the catalogue also advertises wrenches, spanners, cramps and tube cutters, holdfasts and a few drills; the vices were clearly an important part of their range and they named their telegraphic address accordingly: VICES, SHEFFIELD 3)telegraphic addresses were memorable short-codes used to identify the recipients of a telegram. Some telegram addresses became so well known that organisations adopted them as their proper name e.g Interpol.
We know from the Steel Nut & Joseph Hampton ltd (aka Woden) catalogue reproduced below that they also sold a copy of the original Parkinson pattern quick release vice:
Tony Hampton, a distant relative of the founders of these two companies who had worked for the Woden business, told Scott Landis4)c.f The Workbench Book p144 that when Charles and Joseph junior left Woden to set up C & J Hampton in Sheffield (1898) they took the Woden tool line with them and began making vices patterned after Woden’s.
It is unlikely that Woden had started producing a Parkinson’s pattern vice by 1898 as Parkinson’s patent was still in force until 1904. More likely is that Woden and C & J Hampton independently chose to make copies after the patent expired5)of course it is conceivable that there was an earlier Woden-specific pattern that pre-dated the Parkinson pattern – and that C & J Hampton copied this version – but if so the details of it are lost in the mists of time.
C&J Hampton, having created their first quick release woodworker’s vice (copying the Parkinson pattern), soon released a new version. They retained the ‘Record’ trademark presumably with a view to distinguish them from Parkinson’s well known ‘Perfect’ brand.
The new version improved on the previous model by the use of steel rods rather than the cast steel slides used in the Parkinson pattern. The cast iron sliders were comparatively fragile and the polished steel rods afforded a smoother mechanism – a much better design and all the major GB manufacturers had switched to it (including Parkinson) by the 1930s.
Record take credit for introducing this improvement (see catalog entry below) but can’t claim to have had the original idea since, as we saw previously, WC Toles, a US maker, was using steel rods in his vices 20 years earlier:
The likely launch date for the new model was 1918, which is the date of the Registered Design that is cast into the front jaw of these vices. Since there were no original inventions to patent, a registered design would have been the best C&J Hampton’s could have done to get some protection for the new model. The registered design reference is 664709
I contacted the National Archive to get a copy of the design registration records to see if it offered any clues (search and copying fee of £9.10 – no need to thank me!)
As you can see the date it was filed was July 1918 and an extension was noted in July 1923.
But, as we shall see below, it seems that C&J Hampton continued to stamp the RD number for many years after 1923.
the 1907 Patent and Design Act granted you 5 years copyright with the option to extend for two more 5 year periods.
My best guess is that Record did renew for the third and final term granting them design rights until July 1933, but that they had enough old stock of the ‘RD’ casting to carry production after it expired.
The best we can say is that any of the vices with an RD stamp were made between July 1918 to 1933 or thereabouts.
I have assumed C&J Hampton would have been ready to start production as soon as the design patent was filed with the GB patent office, but the earliest evidence of the vice being for sale that I could find is this 1923 catalogue:
At some point after the design patent expired (1933) C & J Hampton – who I’ll just refer to as “Record” from now on, since they eventually decided to trade under this name for all their products – removed the design number from the front jaw casting:
Eventually Record came up with a couple of improvements that they considered worth patenting.
The first idea is actually rather good, but the second, described below, is a bit of a duffer (it does at least help with constructing a timeline for the vices).
A weakness of Parkinson’s quick-release design – perhaps the only serious issue – is that the screw is exposed when the vice is opened and sawdust and shavings falling on the screw can be carried onto the half-nut. If enough debris builds up in the half-nut it can start to ride up the screw thread causing the mechanism to slip, potentially damaging the threads in the process.
In August 1927 Record took out a patent (GB292381) for a “Screw and Nut Cover” – this is a metal cover that extends the length of the screw, preventing sawdust and shavings dropping on the thread. An excellent idea – they gave vices that included the cover an ‘A’ post-fix, which is stamped on the face. The As were about 10% more expensive than the standard model.
in November 1932 Record applied for a new patent, this time for a “sawduster excluder plate” that covers the housing for the half-nut. This change was introduced at the same time as a modification to the housing for the half-nut and they put a blue and yellow sticker on the plates to explain the changes:
- SAWDUST EXCLUDER PLATE TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF MOVING PARTS
- NUT EASILY REMOVED FOR CLEANING
KEEP WORKING PARTS LUBRICATED
some of the plates were engraved with the patent number (just about visible in the example above).
You may well wonder how a part of the vice that is fixed to the underside of your bench could be the cause of sawdust falling in and clogging the working parts – the answer is in the patent:
The nut housing is usually provided with external flanges, lugs or the like by means of which the vice is secured to the under surface of a bench, the bench itself closing the housing. There is, however, often a passage from the bench surface to the housing between the back of the plate like portion of the fixed jaw and the bench mortise in which it is let and this passage, especially in the case of faulty or careless work in erecting the vice on the bench
I leave it to the reader to decide how much of a problem was caused by all this careless vice fitting that was going on in the 1920s and 30s, but suffice to say Record go on to acknowledge (in the same patent) that the problem was already solved by their ‘screw and nut cover’ (see previous section) which they invented 10 years earlier.
The second improvement is more useful: in the old housing there is a captive spring between the casting and the underside of the half nut – this keeps the half-nut pushed against the screw until the lever is turned and the spring compressed:
A consequence of the old design is that the half nut is inaccessible once the vice is fixed to the bench.
The new design (below) has a separate metal housing that is attached to the rear jaw carriage with two bolts which means the the half nut can be removed for cleaning even after the vice has been fixed to the bench.
In the improved design one end of the flat bar is inserted into a castellated nut on the inside of the front jaw that is held under tension by a large watch spring. The spring causes the bar to push the half nut against the screw until the QR lever is activated(it is odd that Record did not include this feature in their patent application, since it is a genuine improvement. A possible explanation is that Woden had already described a detachable screw housing in their 1906 patent GB190625134A), although they do not make any particular claims for it)):
At this stage you will note that the ‘excluder plate’ is rendered even more redundant, since it is no longer necessary to get at the nut from the top.
Although there was nothing to prevent Record from producing the modified vices after the patent was filed at the end of 1932 the first mention I can find for these changes are in the 1935 catalogue6)c.f 1935 pocket Record No 14 catalogue p95.
There is a clear picture of the new housing in a catalogue from 1950, although bizarrely they have left of the “sawdust excluder plate” from the drawing despite having an arrow pointing to where it should be:
My thought about the ‘sawdust excluder plate’ patent was that it was a rather lame attempt by Record to extend IP protection for their vice given that their Registered Design was due to expire a few months later in 1933.
As mentioned above the Registered Design taken out by Record for their new QR release vice design in 1918 ought to have expired no later than 1933, but the RD number continued to be shown on the vices literature after that point. Of course this would be explained if Record simply never got round to updating their catalogue etchings, but many surviving vices have both the RD number and the saw dust excluder plate which can be dated to 1932. Since it is unlikely all the vices with both the RD number and the ‘sawdust extractor plate’ were made between November 1932 and some point in 1933, this suggests that Record continued to use the face casting with the RD number beyond 1933.
Thus the best we can say is that the ‘saw dust extractor’ model was introduced after 1932 and that early versions were available with both a Registered Design number stamped on the face and the transitional face design (shown above) where the space for the RD number is blank.
The final, and arguably most refined version before a complete revamp in the 60s had a newly designed face and a very high quality finish:
unfortunately it is not possible to date it very precisely. Given the transitional model is comparatively rare my guess is that at some point in the late 1930s Record launched this more attractive face design. The earliest catalogue I can find showing this casting is the Record no 16 pocket catalogue (1950).
By the 1940s Record had perfected their vice design and, having ran out of ideas to improve it, filled no more patent applications for us to refer to. Unreliable as they may be, I think the only clues we can get at this distance of time will be from old adverts and catalogues but these are sadly few and far between for Record tools.
A brilliantly simple design7)Note this illustrates the slightly modified version of Parkinson’s original mechanism (introduced by Record in 1932 see Version V above) – the spring in the original design was directly under the half nut.
References [ + ]
|1.||↑||incidentally, the Record woodworker’s vices were available 3 jaw widths: 7”, 9” and 10 1/2″. For reasons best known to themselves, C J Hampton named these with model numbers 52, 52 1/2 and 53 respectively. The 52 1/2 (9”) model is convenient size for lots of wood working jobs and was the most popular option|
|2.||↑||c.f David Lynch http://www.recordhandplanes.com/history.html|
|3.||↑||telegraphic addresses were memorable short-codes used to identify the recipients of a telegram. Some telegram addresses became so well known that organisations adopted them as their proper name e.g Interpol|
|4.||↑||c.f The Workbench Book p144|
|5.||↑||of course it is conceivable that there was an earlier Woden-specific pattern that pre-dated the Parkinson pattern – and that C & J Hampton copied this version – but if so the details of it are lost in the mists of time|
|6.||↑||c.f 1935 pocket Record No 14 catalogue p95|
|7.||↑||Note this illustrates the slightly modified version of Parkinson’s original mechanism (introduced by Record in 1932 see Version V above) – the spring in the original design was directly under the half nut|